Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

CASE OF S.F. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
(Application no. 52077/10)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
15 May 2012
 
 
 

“”71. Having regard to all of the above, the Court concludes that there are substantial grounds for believing that the applicants would be exposed to a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention if deported to Iran in the current circumstances. Accordingly, the Court finds that the implementation of the deportation order against the applicants would give rise to a violation of Article 3 of the Convention…””

“”

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY

2.  Holds that the deportation of the applicants to Iran would give rise to a violation of Article 3 of the Convention;

the Judgement

SÜDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG – 16. Mai 2012 – Abschiebung untersagt

SZ-16Mai2012-ECHR-keine-Abschiebung .pdf

**********************

a former decision

CASE OF R.C. v. SWEDEN  (Application no. 41827/07) 

JUDGMENT – STRASBOURG  –  9 March 2010

FINAL :  09/06/2010  This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION

37.  The applicant claimed that deportation to Iran would subject him to a real risk of being arrested, tortured and perhaps even executed, in violation of his rights under Article 3 of the Convention which reads:

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

Advertisements