Tags
15 May 2012, abschiebung, Application no. 41827/07, Application no. 52077/10, deportation, deportation to Iran, echr, echr judgement, Europen Court of Human Rights, expulsion, iran, R.C. v. Sweden, S.F. v. SWEDEN, Süddeutsche zeitung, sweden, sz, torture
“”71. Having regard to all of the above, the Court concludes that there are substantial grounds for believing that the applicants would be exposed to a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention if deported to Iran in the current circumstances. Accordingly, the Court finds that the implementation of the deportation order against the applicants would give rise to a violation of Article 3 of the Convention…””
“”
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
…
2. Holds that the deportation of the applicants to Iran would give rise to a violation of Article 3 of the Convention;
SÜDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG – 16. Mai 2012 – Abschiebung untersagt
SZ-16Mai2012-ECHR-keine-Abschiebung .pdf
**********************
a former decision
CASE OF R.C. v. SWEDEN (Application no. 41827/07)
JUDGMENT – STRASBOURG – 9 March 2010
FINAL : 09/06/2010 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention.
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION
37. The applicant claimed that deportation to Iran would subject him to a real risk of being arrested, tortured and perhaps even executed, in violation of his rights under Article 3 of the Convention which reads:
“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
ulimuc 
Reblogged this on Ubeudgen’s Blog.